You know and love our Must-Read IT Blogs lists, but now, say hello to the nonprofit side.
The benefits of Voice over Internet Protocol technology have long been known: lower equipment and maintenance costs and, by virtue of combining voice and data over a single network, simplified network management. Nonetheless, large enterprises have been slower to adopt the technology than small businesses.
In 2009, VoIP penetration among U.S. business was 42 percent, according to market research firm In-Stat. Industry experts say there are several reasons for the relatively slow adoption, especially among large businesses.
“Telephony has traditionally been held to a standard of five nines uptime — basically, 10 minutes of downtime per year — as well as having a very high level of voice quality,” says Hyoun Park, telecom and unified communications research analyst at Aberdeen Group.
“There have been concerns in telecom departments about the ability to provide both of those metrics through Voice over IP,” he says. “In addition, companies also worry about moving from a proprietary voice network that is particular to just carrying voice, to a converged network where voice becomes an application.”
Large firms have also succumbed to the misconception that they must totally abandon current phone assets to adopt the new technology. Businesses with large telecom systems have made significant investments, so their turnover rate is likely to be much slower,” says Jeff Ridley, director of product management at ShoreTel. And companies typically don’t even start looking at VoIP until their circuit-switched Public Branch Exchange (PBX) system becomes cost prohibitive because of repairs and workarounds.
Legacy equipment was built to last for several years; however, companies don’t want to be forced into replacing an entire system because it’s at the end of its life.
“The biggest questions tend to be around how long the business can still support the equipment,” Park adds. “This is especially true as product models are no longer available and vendors stop providing much needed product support.”
Cost is the primary reason that most companies switch to a single network for voice and data. “The benefits of combining voice and data infrastructure are that you’re managing one network,” says Manfred Arndt, HP distinguished technologist, UC and convergence solutions. “Here, businesses realize the cost reductions associated with simplifying systems.”
In general, there can be false economics that come into play. “Some companies are just now starting to realize if a legacy phone system is expected to last for 10 years, and they’re on year number eight, the maintenance cost of those legacy systems can prove to be fairly high,” Ridley says.
“We are seeing more analysis and investigation of that,” he adds. “The first thing to look at is what it costs to maintain the old system. In some cases, you’ll find it’s economically prohibitive to keep the old system compared with new technology.”
Often, manufacturers offer businesses online tools to help compare the cost of a telephony upgrade with the cost of maintaining the status quo. For example, ShoreTel provides a total cost of ownership (TCO) tool to compare the cost of maintaining a legacy system for five years versus to cost of upgrading to VoIP, Ridley adds.
“We allow IT decision-makers to make an explicit comparison between maintaining their legacy system over the next five years,” he says. “This will include certain amounts of upgrades, ongoing support and maintenance costs, versus the installation of a new IP system.”
The reasons for businesses to adopt VoIP continue to grow. “Today, companies can get better voice quality with VoIP than is available on the PSTN [public switched telephone network],” says Patrick Ferriter, senior director of product management at Polycom. “And being based on open standards, high-definition voice leverages SIP [Session Initiation Protocol] and G.722, so it is compatible with many other vendors’ endpoints and call control servers.”
Once a business has determined that VoIP is the more cost-effective approach, it’s time to make a detailed plan regarding what kind of system to implement. VoIP can encompass everything from simple voice gateways to full-fledged unified communications.
Rather than make the decision from a technological standpoint, Ridley recommends analyzing business communication needs. The idea is to design a system that meets those requirements.
“The first thing that IT chiefs need to know as they look at this migration is what their business is about and who are the business decision-makers,” Ridley explains. “Go out and interview the sales leaders, business development, the contact center, the marketing department and more.
“It’s important to understand the role they’re playing in the business, the bottlenecks and the places where their natural flow of business is being impaired because of communication problems,” he adds. “Those communication issues can affect everything from customer service to internal processes.”
Keep in mind, it’s not just how many phones a company has in the building. It’s a solutions-oriented approach.
“Don’t start with how many salespeople you have,” Ridley adds. “Start with how many people are mobile. How do you reach those people when they’re mobile? How do they contact their customers? When you change the conversation, you change the value you give customers.”
More companies are finding that mobility is a key driver for implementing VoIP. “For more businesses, it’s about keeping people connected and communicating when they’re in the office, when they’re away from their desk running around the building, when they’re working from home and when they’re traveling or in an airport,” Ridley says.
The next step is to perform a network assessment. Rolling out VoIP without conducting the appropriate internal assessments and predeployment testing usually results in unplanned downtime and poor service quality.
Some telephony manufacturers provide a readiness assessment that looks at the network to further assure VoIP readiness. The assessment typically talks about such things as quality of service and prioritization in terms of readying that network to make the change.
And there’s one step that organizations ignore too frequently: training. “You want to get administrators comfortable and ready with the system, and get some kind of training for the end users,” Ridley says.
“People are going from their old ways of communicating to new ways of communicating,” he adds. “It might be fairly straightforward to do, but the reassurance of training is really valuable in getting them to embrace and truly leverage what’s going on.”
In most cases, a phased implementation toward IP convergence is the best approach to upgrading or replacing legacy PBX systems. “If a company has a traditional circuit-switched or digital PBX or analog Centrex service, the first step is to migrate to a hosted IP-based service for telephony or to deploy an IP PBX,” says Polycom’s Ferriter.
Today, the same IP telephony and rich business applications can be delivered through an onsite solution (IP PBX) or a solution deployed in the cloud (hosted IP). The IP PBX is a business telephone system designed to deliver voice or video over a data network and interoperate with the normal PSTN.
In addition, it’s important for businesses to deploy an IP PBX or a hosted service that is based on open standards. The leading open standard for IP telephony and control of multimedia sessions is SIP. This provides the most flexibility and choice for the business in terms of device selection and service options.
“The migration path for those companies that are still running older systems can include using assets they already have,” says Ajay Kapoor, vice president of customer services at Avaya. “They then migrate to the IP that’s going to provide the best business case.”
IP convergence can happen in three places within a business communication network: from the service provider to the enterprise to the PBX, and from the PBX to the end user. In some cases, legacy systems can be upgraded without massive infrastructure changes.
“The baseline value that a business can derive is significant cost savings through the use of SIP trunking — replacing traditional telephony — to a service provider,” says Ferriter. The business can also save on the costs of all calls between sites or between remote or home workers.
However, there are variables to consider: How robust is the existing data infrastructure? How old is the existing PBX, and what function does it serve? If voice is a more mission-critical application for a company than e-mail, that fact needs to be considered when migrating over to the next-generation IP telephony set.
“There are a lot of financial organizations that have very unique applications ingrained in their business process. To transition that is no easy task,” says Tom Puorro, senior director of product management at Cisco Systems. “So it’s always good to fully understand how the business is using telephony as a converged application and where those dollars will be saved versus spent.”